TomsTechBlog.com

It's hard to say these days

My92 - Following Up

clock January 26, 2008 21:46 by author Tom

About a month ago I wrote this post about KGBY, my favorite Sacramento radio station, firing all their DJs and switching to a completely automated format.  Its still a point of curiosity to me and this post on radiomatthew.com reminded me that it had been exactly a month since my last post which seemed like a good time for a follow up.

This is barely tech related so I'll ask forgiveness as I stray a bit. 

The first thing I have to grudgingly say is that I don't think the mix is that bad.  I don't know how much user input had to do with it but the station does manage to produce a good song more often than not.  Beyond that the station hasn't changed much.  Its still just songs with a robotic voice following each song to tell you what the song was and who was singing it.  I thought they'd try to mimic JackFM more in that Jack does a really good job of imbuing the station itself with personality (using sly ads with callers who call in to say random things to "Jack") but My92 seems to think the completely automated approach will work instead.  We'll see. 

On the website, it has changed quite a bit. 

 My925

One of the things Clear Channel has done right (at least conceptually) is to create some generalized content and then create local web sites around that content.   Most music news for example is universal no matter where you live so there's no point in having each station make their own web site.  

That said, I think its a mistake in My92's case.  If you are going to push your station as an interactive one and specifically mention your web presence than you need to have a specialized web site. 

So that, in a nutshell, is what I think of the new My92.  Still a poor excuse for everything it said it was trying to accomplish but not a terrible radio station when all is said and done.  That said, there's an old adage in the radio business that says people claim they want radio without DJs but always stop listening when the DJs are taken away.  My92 isn't a bad mix but I'm not sure its dramatically better than its competition and its competition has actual people on the air.  So I'm real curious to see the ratings book for the next quarter. 

Addendum: I wanted to throw out a couple things that just really shocked me while listening but were too random to fit the flow of the post...

Things that surprise me

Employing former DJs in lesser positions: I don't want to be too critical of this, it is nice of them not to put her out on the street, but I have to admit to feeling a little weird about the former mid-day host Heather Lee now being the traffic reporter.  Its sort of like firing your Senior VP and then offering to hire them back as the Janitor.  There's nothing wrong with being a Janitor but if you used to be the Senior VP in the same company it feels more like kicking sand in the person's face.

Former DJs doing Commercials: Call me crazy, but if I'm going to fire all the DJs from a station then I'm also going to get my sponsors to re-record their Ads even if I have to pay for it out of my own pocket.  Listeners already feel a little disloyal for not leaving the station when their favorite DJ was fired so having the disembodied voice of that DJ on a commercial every 1/2 hour only exacerbates the guilt.  I know it made me want to turn the station off.

Contests: Something about having no people on the air and still having contests seems contradictory to me.  Contests and DJs are sort of interlinked and having contests without DJs seems to draw attention to the mechanical nature of the station. 

My Midday MyPod: The station's primary contest seems to be the "Midday MyPod" where a listener gets to pick 5 songs that are played at noon.  I find it kind of funny that a radio station is tying its branding so closely to the iPod being the reason most people rarely listen to the radio anymore is because they have iPods.  Seems counterproductive to me. (on top of that, the one time I listened specifically for this contest they didn't start until about 12:15pm which is just sloppy)

The Asian My925: The station goes by "My925" but a quick trip over to www.my925.com shows the domain is actually owned by a jewelry store in China.  They actually re-branded their station, which is supposed to be interactive with a focus on the web, with a name that they couldn't get the web address to.  That's stupid.



My92 - Finally a radio station for people who don't care about their privacy

clock December 26, 2007 22:16 by author Tom

I'm back from vacation (having driven most of the morning to get from Northern California back to my home in Southern California).  It was an interesting trip and one that brought up a few issues that I'll be tackling here in the next few days.  But to start off I wanted to bring up something that happened today.

When I was a kid I spent a lot of summers in Sacramento, CA and one of my favorite radio stations was Y92 a.k.a. KGBY Sacramento (Yes, I liked Soft Rock as a kid, sue me).  This morning, as I headed home at 6am, I got to hear Y92 go off the air for the last time as it switched formats and was replaced by My925 FM moving from "Adult Contemporary" to "Adult Hits" (Goodbye Elton John, Hello Foo Fighters). 

The change wasn't just skin deep as the station fired all of its on site talent (some of which had been on the air for 20+ years) and decided to go with a JackFM-esque automated format.   Matthew of radiomatthew.com (which I read regularly) has the official blurb on his blog.   To quote from there...

Introducing: My92.5. As speculated, My92.5 will feature harder alternative styles from bands like Led Zeppelin (perfect in time for their comeback), Red Hot Chili Peppers, No Doubt, and Santana. There will be no jocks or on-air talent; instead, the station will deliver a playlist driven by station listeners. My92.5 will become one of the first stations in Sacramento to utilize the Internet and the social networking atmosphere to create on-air music diversity.

Now as much as I loved the old Y92 I obviously love technology so as soon as I got a chance I headed over to their site to see what this new "Social Networking based Radio Station" had to offer.  What I found was this...

My92 copy

The actual station itself is equally unimpressive with songs being played one after the other with a voice that sounds a lot like the lady you get when you dial a disconnected number announcing the title and artist after each song.

If there was ever a template for how to badly re-launch a radio station while badly launching a social site this is certainly it.  The web site gives no explanation of who they are, why they need the information they're asking for or what they are going to do with it once they get it.  Yet they are asking anyone wanting access to hand over all their contact information from Cell phone to IM Screen name upfront. 

Beyond that they're collecting the information badly.  If you want to run an automated station you probably should have some way of putting the user's songs directly into a database (like for example fields for "Artist of Song #1", "Title of Song #1", etc...)  To have the user enter the songs in to a text box and then pay an actual person to transcribe them manually is a waste of time. 

Anyway, Not wanting to judge the book by its cover I coughed up my personal info to see what they had (or the personal info I give sites like this at least).  What did I find?  The above shown site...I kid you not...is their entire web site.  Once you enter your info it redirects back to the page you see in the graphic. 

If this is all that Clear Channel, the largest radio station owner in the U.S., can put forward when it comes to interactive programming than it reinforces my feeling that radio is a dead medium.  More over, if you are going to try to use the Internet to boost a dying property you should really find someone who knows what they are doing in the space and team with them rather than embarrassing yourself like this. 

I certainly don't agree with everything a guy like Mark Cantor has to say but there's no doubt he could have done something a thousand times better than this and almost certainly done it cheaper (since there are resources he'd have available from previous projects).  Rest in Peace Y92, I suspect your predecessor will be joining you on the scrap heap before too long. 



About Me

Not really relevant right now. This blog is on hiatus. I really haven't decided if it is an indefinite hiatus yet

For the record if you've tried to e-mail me over the last 4 to 6 months I didn't mean to ignore you. The e-mail forwarding isn't working and I didn't realize that until months worth of e-mails had been deleted on forward. The tom@tomstechblog.com address still won't forward to the postmaster account and I don't know why because it's provided by the webhost. But if you're one of my old blog pen pals I would always welcome an e-mail from you at the postmaster@tomstechblog.com address

Contact

- E-Mail Tom

Search

Subscribe

- Subscribe to this Blog

Calendar

<<  June 2013  >>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456

Archive

Tags

Categories


Blogroll

    Disclaimer

    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    © Copyright 2013

    Sign in